ibm-information-center/dist/eclipse/plugins/i5OS.ic.rzajt_5.4.0.1/rzajtrzajtperanynetin.htm

52 lines
3.1 KiB
HTML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en-US" xml:lang="en-us">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="dc.language" scheme="rfc1766" content="en-us" />
<!-- All rights reserved. Licensed Materials Property of IBM -->
<!-- US Government Users Restricted Rights -->
<!-- Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by -->
<!-- GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. -->
<meta name="dc.date" scheme="iso8601" content="2005-09-06" />
<meta name="copyright" content="(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2006" />
<meta name="security" content="public" />
<meta name="Robots" content="index,follow"/>
<meta http-equiv="PICS-Label" content='(PICS-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true r (cz 1 lz 1 nz 1 oz 1 vz 1) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0) "http://www.classify.org/safesurf/" l gen true r (SS~~000 1))' />
<title>Performance considerations for AnyNet communications</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="ibmidwb.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="ic.css" />
</head>
<body>
<a id="Top_Of_Page" name="Top_Of_Page"></a><!-- Java sync-link -->
<script language = "Javascript" src = "../rzahg/synch.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<a name="rzajtper-anynetin"></a>
<h4 id="rzajtper-anynetin">Performance considerations for AnyNet communications</h4>
<p>AnyNet&reg; communications is a good performance factor for you to consider.
It is more expensive to use than any of the i5/OS&trade; protocols because you spend twice as
much to run two protocols.</p>
<p>To optimize AnyNet performance, consider the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>For send and receive pairs, the most efficient use of an interface is
with its own protocol stack. That is, intersystem communications function
(ICF) and common programming interface communications (CPI Communications)
perform the best with advanced program-to-program communications (APPC). There
is additional CPU time when the crossover between the protocols processes.</li>
<li>Each communications interface performs differently depending on the scenario.
ICF and CPI Communications perform the best with APPC.</li></ul>
<a name="wq13"></a>
<div class="notetitle" id="wq13">Note:</div>
<div class="notebody">An alternative to AnyNet communications is to have SNA and TCP/IP
running parallel or over the same lines in your network. Hence, performance
implications can be surpassed by not using AnyNet.</div>
<p>See <a href="rzajtrzajtcfg400toanynetpo.htm#rzajt-cfg400toanynet-po">AnyNet communications for the iSeries system</a> for the answer to the question:
What is AnyNet?</p>
<p>For more information about AnyNet/400 sockets, see the book <a href="../rzab6/rzab6mst.pdf" target="_blank">Sockets Programming</a>
<img src="wbpdf.gif" alt="Link to PDF" />.</p>
<a id="Bot_Of_Page" name="Bot_Of_Page"></a>
</body>
</html>