ibm-information-center/dist/eclipse/plugins/i5OS.ic.rzahy_5.4.0.1/rzahyaccesseval.htm

146 lines
9.3 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2024-04-02 14:02:31 +00:00
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en-US" xml:lang="en-us">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="dc.language" scheme="rfc1766" content="en-us" />
<!-- All rights reserved. Licensed Materials Property of IBM -->
<!-- US Government Users Restricted Rights -->
<!-- Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by -->
<!-- GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. -->
<meta name="dc.date" scheme="iso8601" content="2005-09-06" />
<meta name="copyright" content="(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2006" />
<meta name="security" content="public" />
<meta name="Robots" content="index,follow"/>
<meta http-equiv="PICS-Label" content='(PICS-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true r (cz 1 lz 1 nz 1 oz 1 vz 1) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0) "http://www.classify.org/safesurf/" l gen true r (SS~~000 1))' />
<title>Directory Server (LDAP) - Access evaluation</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="ibmidwb.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="ic.css" />
</head>
<body>
<a id="Top_Of_Page" name="Top_Of_Page"></a><!-- Java sync-link -->
<script language = "Javascript" src = "../rzahg/synch.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<a name="rzahyaccesseval"></a>
<h4 id="rzahyaccesseval">Access evaluation</h4>
<p>Access for a particular operation is granted or denied based on the subject's
bind DN for that operation on the target object. Processing stops as soon
as access can be determined.</p>
<p>The checks for access are done by first finding the effective <span class="bold">entryOwnership</span> and <span class="bold">ACI</span> definition, checking
for entry ownership, and then by evaluating the object's ACI values.</p>
<p>Filter-based ACLs accumulate from the lowest containing entry, upward along
the ancestor entry chain, to the highest containing entry in the DIT. The
effective access is calculated as the union of the access rights granted,
or denied, by the constituent ancestor entries. The existing set of specificity
and combinatory rules are used to evaluate effective access for filter based
ACLs.</p>
<p>Filter-based and non-filter-based attributes are mutually exclusive within
a single containing directory entry. Placing both types of attributes into
the same entry is not allowed, and is a constraint violation. Operations
associated with the creation of, or updates to, a directory entry fail if
this condition is detected.</p>
<p>When calculating effective access, the first ACL type to be detected in
the ancestor chain of the target object entry sets the mode of calculation.
In filter-based mode, non-filter-based ACLs are ignored in effective access
calculation. Likewise, in non-filter-based mode, filter-based ACLs are ignored
in effective access calculation.</p>
<p>To limit the accumulation of filter-based ACLs in the calculation of effective
access, an <span class="bold">ibm-filterAclInherit</span> attribute
set to a value of "false" can be placed in any entry between the highest and
lowest occurrence of <span class="bold">ibm-filterAclEntry</span> in
a given subtree. This causes the subset of <span class="bold">ibm-filterAclEntry</span> attributes above it in the target object's ancestor chain to be ignored.</p>
<p>In filter-based ACL mode, if no filter-based ACL applies, the default ACL
applies (cn=anybody is granted read, search, and compare access to attributes
in the <tt class="xph">normal</tt> access class). This situation can occur
when the entry being accessed does not match any of the filters specified
in the <span class="bold">ibm-filterAclEntry</span> values. You might
want to specify a default filter ACL like the following if you do not want
this default access control to apply:</p>
<pre class="xmp">ibm-filterAclEntry: group:cn=anybody:(objectclass=*):</pre><p class="indatacontent">This example grants no access. Change it to provide the access you want
applied.</p>
<p>By default, the directory administrator and the master server or the peer
server (for replication) get full access rights to all objects in the directory
except write access to system attributes. Other <span class="bold">entryOwners</span> get full access rights to the objects under their ownership
except write access to system attributes. All users have read access rights
to system and restricted attributes. These predefined rights cannot be altered.
If the requesting subject has <span class="bold">entryOwnership</span>,
access is determined by the above default settings and access processing stops.</p>
<p>If the requesting subject is not an entryOwner, then the ACI values for
the object entries are checked. The access rights as defined in the ACIs
for the target object are calculated by the specificity and combinatory rules.</p>
<dl>
<dt class="bold">Specificity rule </dt>
<dd>The most specific aclEntry definitions are the ones used in the evaluation
of permissions granted/denied to a user. The levels of specificity are:
<ul>
<li>Access-id is more specific than group or role. Groups and roles are on
the same level.</li>
<li>Within the same <span class="bold">dnType</span> level, individual attribute
level permissions are more specific than attribute class level permissions.</li>
<li>Within the same attribute or attribute class level, <span class="bold">deny</span> is more specific than <span class="bold">grant</span>.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt class="bold">Combinatory rule </dt>
<dd>Permissions granted to subjects of equal specificity are combined. If
the access cannot be determined within the same specificity level, the access
definitions of lesser specific level are used. If the access is not determined
after all defined ACIs are applied, the access is denied.
<a name="wq66"></a>
<div class="notetitle" id="wq66">Note:</div>
<div class="notebody">After a matching access-id level <span class="bold">aclEntry</span> is found in
access evaluation, the group level aclEntries are not included in access calculation.
The exception is that if the matching access-id level <span class="bold">aclEntries</span> are all defined under cn=this, then all matching group level <span class="bold">aclEntries</span> are also combined in the evaluation.</div>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>In other words, within the object entry, if a defined ACI entry contains
an access-id subject DN that matches the bind DN, then the permissions are
first evaluated based on that aclEntry. Under the same subject DN, if matching
attribute level permissions are defined, they supersede any permissions defined
under the attribute classes. Under the same attribute or attribute class
level definition, if conflicting permissions are present, denied permissions
override granted permissions. </p>
<a name="wq67"></a>
<div class="notetitle" id="wq67">Note:</div>
<div class="notebody">A defined null value permission
prevents the inclusion of less specific permission definitions.</div>
<p>If access still cannot be determined and all found matching aclEntries
are defined under "cn=this", then group membership is evaluated. If a user
belongs to more than one groups, the user receives the combined permissions
from these groups. Additionally, the user automatically belongs to the cn=Anybody
group and possibly the cn=Authenticated group if the user did an authenticated
bind. If permissions are defined for those groups, the user receives the
specified permissions. </p>
<a name="wq68"></a>
<div class="notetitle" id="wq68">Note:</div>
<div class="notebody">Group and Role membership
is determined at bind time and last until either another bind takes place,
or until an unbind request is received. Nested groups and roles, that is
a group or role defined as a member of another group or role, are not resolved
in membership determination nor in access evaluation.</div>
<p>For example, assume attribute1 is in the sensitive attribute class, and
user cn=Person A, o=IBM belongs to both group1 and group2 with the following
aclEntries defined: </p>
<ol type="1">
<li>aclEntry: access-id: cn=Person A, o=IBM: at.attributel:grant:rsc:sensitive:deny:rsc</li>
<li>aclEntry: group: cn=group1,o=IBM:critical:deny:rwsc</li>
<li>aclEntry: group: cn=group2,o=IBM:critical:grant:r:normal:grant:rsc</li></ol><p class="indatacontent">This user gets: </p>
<ul>
<li>Access of 'rsc' to attribute1, (from 1. Attribute level definition supersedes
attribute class level definition).</li>
<li>No access to other sensitive class attributes in the target object, (from
1).</li>
<li>No other rights are granted (2 and 3 are NOT included in access evaluation).</li></ul>
<p>For another example, with the following aclEntries: </p>
<ol type="1">
<li>aclEntry: access-id: cn=this: sensitive</li>
<li>aclEntry: group: cn=group1,o=IBM:sensitive:grant:rsc:normal:grant:rsc</li></ol><p class="indatacontent">The user has: </p>
<ul>
<li>no access to sensitive class attributes, (from 1. Null value defined under
access-id prevents the inclusion of permissions to sensitive class attributes
from group1).</li>
<li>and access of 'rsc' to normal class attributes (from 2).</li></ul>
<a id="Bot_Of_Page" name="Bot_Of_Page"></a>
</body>
</html>